Legal Opinion
Clyde M. Kellogg v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 4, 2000No. 00-1893PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Per curiam
Clyde M. Kellogg (Kellogg) appeals the district court’s 1 order granting summary judgment to Union Pacific Railroad (Union Pacific) on his claim of discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12117 (2000). Kellogg also maintains that summary judgment was improper because an earlier agreement with Union Pacific guaranteed his continued employment with the company. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
Kellogg was a third-generation employee of Union Pacific whose career with the company spanned twenty-six years. Beginning as a switchman/brakeman…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Paul J. Kiel v. Select Artificials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ellen Fjellestad v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Sam Duty v. Norton-Alcoa ProppantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Kathy Heisler v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Stephen C. Orr v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Lawrence J. Mathieu v. Gopher News CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Bialko v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.