Legal Opinion
Sam Duty v. Norton-Alcoa Proppants
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2002No. 01-1478PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Norton-Alcoa Proppants (“NAP”) appeals from a final order entered in United States District Court2 denying its motion for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial, amendment pf the judgment, or remittur following a jury award of $305,000.00 in favor of its former employee Sam Duty for compensatory and liquidated damages arising from violations of the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S:C. § 2601 et seq., and punitive damages arising from violations of the Arkansas Civil Rights Act (“ACRA”), Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-101 et seq. Duty v. Norton-Alcoa…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Ronald J. Fenney v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus on Behalf of TheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Yulanda Hill v. Carolyn WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Chris Schaffhauser v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Linda K. Brumbalough v. Camelot Care Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Barbara Rodgers v. City of Des Moines Ronald WakehamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.