Legal Opinion
Blodgett v. Foster
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from Kent; Grove, J. Bill by Delos A. Blodgett and Delos F. Diggins against John J. Foster and Henry N. Anderson for an accounting. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
A reference to the report of this case when it was here before (Blodgett v. Foster, 114 Mich. 688) will do away with need of making so long a statement of the case as would otherwise be necessary. Upon the trial of the case the witnesses were examined in open court. As a result of concessions made by the solicitors in open court, there are not many questions now open for controversy. One of the most important questions relates to the effect of a contract reading as follows:
“In consideration of the faithful performance of the above and foregoing contract by the parties of the-first part, which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goebel v. LinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Moore v. Detroit Locomotive WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Blodgett v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Conkling v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Crane v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Schwartzreich v. . Bauman-Basch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Garfield & Proctor Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Scanlon v. NorthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Sasso v. K. G. & G. Realty & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.