Schwartzreich v. . Bauman-Basch, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 28, 1919, affirming a determination of the Appellate Term, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order of the trial justice in the City Court of the city of New York setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and directing a dismissal of the complaint and reinstated said verdict.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 28, 1919, affirming a determination of the Appellate Term, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order of the trial justice in the City Court of the city of New York setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and directing a dismissal of the complaint and reinstated said verdict. Not only was there lacking evidence of a cancellation of the first contract for $90 before the second contract for $100 was agreed upon, but it…
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
On the 31st day of August, 1917, the plaintiff entered into the following employment agreement with the defendant:
“ Bauman-Basch, Inc.,
“ Coats & Wraps
“ 31-33 East 32nd Street
“ New York
“ Agreement entered into this 31st day of August, 1917, by and between Bauman-Basch, Inc., a domestic corporation, party of the first part, and Louis Schwartzreich, of the Borough of Bronx, City of New York, party of the second part, Witnesseth:
“ The party of the first part does hereby employ the party of the second part, and the party of the second part agrees to enter the services of the party of the first…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Vanderbilt v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Davis & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Lattimore v. HarsenNew York Supreme Court · 1817
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- McGovern v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- In re the Estate of SchanzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Green v. DonigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.