Legal Opinion

Santa Barbara Patients' Collective Health Cooperative v. City of Santa Barbara

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 29, 2012No. Case No. CV 10-06534 DDP (RCx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*889ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

Presently before the court is Defendant City of Santa Barbara’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for Mootness under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Defendant contends that because Plaintiff Santa Barbara Patients’ Collective Health Cooperative (“SBPCHC”) has closed its marijuana dispensary in the face of an enforcement action by the United States Attorney’s Office, Plaintiffs action is moot.

After reviewing the parties’ papers and hearing oral argument, the court grants the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Vallejo v. Ncorp4, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Benno v. BosenkoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. Benno v. BosenkoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. City of Vallejo v. NCORP4, Inc. 9./29/17 CA1/3 Case DetailsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API