Santa Barbara Patients' Collective Health Cooperative v. City of Santa Barbara
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*889ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
Presently before the court is Defendant City of Santa Barbara’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for Mootness under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Defendant contends that because Plaintiff Santa Barbara Patients’ Collective Health Cooperative (“SBPCHC”) has closed its marijuana dispensary in the face of an enforcement action by the United States Attorney’s Office, Plaintiffs action is moot.
After reviewing the parties’ papers and hearing oral argument, the court grants the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Vallejo v. Ncorp4, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Benno v. BosenkoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Benno v. BosenkoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- City of Vallejo v. NCORP4, Inc. 9./29/17 CA1/3 Case DetailsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017