Legal Opinion
Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. City of Oakland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 2003No. 02-15220PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from a constitutional challenge to a pair of city ordinances that place maintenance and habitability restrictions on hotels, motels, and rooming houses (“hotels”) located in Oakland, California. One ordinance requires all hotels to comply with certain maintenance, habitability, security and record-keeping standards. The other ordinance reclassifies those hotels with so-called “non-conforming use” status to “Deemed Approved” status, and requires Deemed Approved hotels to comply with the new standards in order to retain that status. Appellants, the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Dias v. City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Hunt v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- National Organization for Marriage v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District, (SCAQMD)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Thi Marilyn DangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.