Cv-12-0319-Pr State of Arizona v. Joseph Cooperman
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice BERCH,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 This case addresses (a) whether partition ratio evidence is admissible in a prosecution for driving while impaired in violation of A.R.S. § 28-1381(A)(l) if the state elects to introduce breath test results only to prove that the defendant had “an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more within two hours of driving” in violation of AR.S. § 28-1381(A)(2), and (b) whether evidence relating to the variability of partition ratios in the general population is relevant to a particular defendant’s state of impairment. We conclude that such evidence is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. HensleyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. McNealCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- State of Arizona v. Rodney Eugene HardyArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. PrinceArizona Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. VangelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Steinle ex rel. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Jay Alton RoachIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.