Legal Opinion

People v. Vangelder

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2013No. S195423PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

In this prosecution for driving while having a proscribed alcohol concentration in blood or breath, the trial court excluded expert witness testimony challenging the reliability of breath-alcohol testing machines. Reviewing the ensuing conviction, the Court of Appeal determined that the trial court erred, and reversed for a new trial. We conclude that the trial court properly excluded the challenged expert testimony with respect to the charge of driving while having a proscribed alcohol concentration. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the appellate court and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  5. State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Coffey v. ShiomotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Jay Alton RoachIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Najera v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. (HC) Verdugo v. PfeifferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. (HC) Wilson v. CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API