People v. Vangelder
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
In this prosecution for driving while having a proscribed alcohol concentration in blood or breath, the trial court excluded expert witness testimony challenging the reliability of breath-alcohol testing machines. Reviewing the ensuing conviction, the Court of Appeal determined that the trial court erred, and reversed for a new trial. We conclude that the trial court properly excluded the challenged expert testimony with respect to the charge of driving while having a proscribed alcohol concentration. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the appellate court and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coffey v. ShiomotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Jay Alton RoachIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- Najera v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- (HC) Verdugo v. PfeifferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (HC) Wilson v. CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.