Legal Opinion
Beckley v. Bd. Of Admin CalPERS CA1/4
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 2013No. A135418UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RIVERA, J.
Plaintiff Perry C. Beckley was a California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer until the CHP determined he was not able to perform the tasks required of an officer. He applied for disability retirement, and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) denied his application, ruling that Beckley was not disabled from carrying out the duties of the position he had most recently held as a public affairs officer (PAO). Beckley brought a petition for writ of mandate, which the trial court granted. CalPERS has appealed. We shall affirm the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Pellegrini v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- DeMartini v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dhillon v. John Muir HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Davis v. Cnty. of Fresno, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Martinez v. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cal. Dept Justice v. Bd. etc. Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Davis v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.