Los Angeles National Bank v. Vance
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeal on the judgment-roll from a judgment rendered against defendant upon a stipulation of the facts, defendant’s sole contention being that the facts stipulated do not support the judgment.
For the purpose of securing the location of a federal building upon certain lots of land in the city of Los Angeles, bounded by Main, Temple and New High streets, and consisting of two hundred and ninety-three feet frontage on Main street, extending through to New High street, Silas A. Yance, defendant’s testator, with others, signed an agreement which, after reciting that they would be mutually…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Lasar v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Grand Lodge of the Independent Order of Good Templars v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Christian Coll. v. HendleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Hodges v. NaltyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Woolley v. SeijoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Weinberg Co. v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Douglas v. BergereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Horseshoe Pier Amusement Co. v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.