Weinberg Co. v. Heller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, J.,
The subject of this action consists of an alleged obligation of the appellant to pay one-half of all expenses incurred in the preparation, trial and appeal of a suit for injunction and damages, instituted by said corpora tion. A concise statement of the relations of the above-named parties, and the subject matter of the former suit, are best presented by the language of a contract in writing, denominated “Agreement of Employment,” dated November 22, 1915, which forms the basis of this proceeding. We therefore quote therefrom the provisions which are essential to a determination of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Weinberg Co. v. BixbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Flanagan v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Ashe v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Beekman v. Van DolsenNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- McArthur v. BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Sorensen v. the Overland CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- Metropolitan Water District v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- County of Kings v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Board of Education v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.