Lasar v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.—
The complaint alleges that plaintiffs constitute the subscription committee of Los Osos Parlor, Ro. 61, of the Rative Sons of the Golden West, a social and benevolent organization in the city of San Luis Obispo, who, for the purpose of entertaining the grand parlor of said' organization at their meeting in said city from April 26, 1896, to and including Hay 1, 1896, procured the signature of the defendants to a subscription paper, of which the following is a copy:
*552“San Luis Obispo, Cal., January 1, 1896.
“We, the undersigned citizens and business men of the city of San Luis Obispo,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cottage Street Methodist Episcopal Church v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Barnes v. . PerineNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Presb. Church of Albany v. . CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Wise v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Roberts v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- I. & I. Holding Corp. v. GainsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Nisbet v. Clio Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
- Thorpe v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.