Legal Opinion

Slingo v. Steele-Wedeles Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 11, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Trespass, de bonis asportatis. Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for defendants by direction of the court; appeal by plaintiff. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Horton

The foregoing statement is sufficiently explicit to present the questions upon which we dispose of this appeal. The various charges of fraud and deception have been intentionally omitted.

It is contended on behalf of appellant that appellee can not justify the seizure of appellant’s property under said mortgage, first, because no demand was made upon the note which was payable on demand, and, second, because there is no evidence that the mortgagee had reasonable grounds to feel insecure or unsafe. Both of these contentions are well founded.

For some purposes a note payable on demand is due as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roy v. GoingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Whittemore v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Furlong v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Travelers' Insurance v. PullingIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Pulling v. Travelers' InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Theodosakis v. AUSTIN BK. OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Watson v. CudneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  3. Albert Pick & Co. v. SpoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  4. James v. SpeerMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Mausert v. Mutual Distributing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API