Theodosakis v. AUSTIN BK. OF CHICAGO
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda
This is an appeal from the trial court order which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint as amended. The issues presented for review are: (1) whether the complaint, as amended, states a cause of action; (2) whether the purported modification agreement of December 20, 1974, converted the demand note into an installment note; and (3) whether the bank’s renewal note of August 18,1979, was unilaterally and without consideration ineffective to alter the terms of the December 20, 1974, agreement. We affirm.
The complaint as amended contains the following allegations.
On March…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mother Earth, Ltd. v. Strawberry Camel, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Horwath v. ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Fowley v. BradenIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Dickinson v. DickinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Courtney v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wysocki v. BedrosianAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Davis v. Keystone Printing Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- DeLuna v. St. Elizabeth's HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Commerce Bank, N.A. v. PlotkinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Conant v. KarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.