Legal Opinion

Gyrodata Inc. v. Gyro Technologies, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 22, 2009No. Civil Action H-09-1005Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. HOYT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is the plaintiff, Gyro-data Incorporated’s (“Gyrodata”) first amended application for preliminary injunction (Docket Entry No. 62), the defendants’, Gyro Technologies, Inc. and Dataflow Measurement Systems, Limited (collectively, “Gyro Tech”), memorandum of law regarding issues presented in the application for preliminary injunction (Docket Entry No. 77), Gyrodata’s memorandum of law in support of its application (Docket Entry No. 79), Gyro Tech’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API