Hurwitz v. Gross
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P. James, Judge. The 'facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Herbert Cutler Brown, and George H. Moore, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action to recover damages for failure to perform an agreement to assume payment of t\yo certain chattel mortgages. Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff, on the nineteenth day of January, 1905, was the owner of four parcels of land (designated in his complaint as one, two, three and four, respectively), located in Los Angeles county, upon which, or portions of which, there were growing crops. Against these lands and the crops thereon there subsisted four mortgages; two against the lands for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Cowdery v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Roche v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Smith v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Butler v. SequeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Operators Royalty & Producing Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.