Legal Opinion

Smith v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1948No. Civ. 3673PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

From a judgment of dismissal after order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend as to two causes of action set forth in the complaint, plaintiffs appeal.

Bach cause of action is based upon the same alleged derelictions and negligence of defendants in their claimed unreasonable delay in acting upon an application of the deceased, Julius H. Smith, for a policy of life insurance.

In the first count, the widow, Ann Morris Smith, was plaintiff and alleged to be the beneficiary named in the application. In the second count, Josephine Irving, as administratrix of the estate of decesead, appeared…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Duffie v. Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. McKee v. DoddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Aim Insurance Co. v. CulcasiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Collins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API