Legal Opinion

Graham v. . Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PbtitioN of plaintiff to rerinstate appeal dismissed at -'September Term, 1893, for that the same was not brought to the proper Term of this Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

This action was tried at November Term, 1892, of the Court below, and should-have been docketed here before the close of the call of the District to which it belonged at Spring Term, 1893. Though, as the appellee did not move to dismiss under Rule 17, the appeal could have been docketed at any time during that term. Porter v. Railroad, 106 N. C., 478. The appeal was not docketed till Fall Term, 1893, and was then, on motion of appellee, dismissed. This is a motion to re-instate the appeal made at Fall Term and continued over to this. It is based on two grounds:

-1. That the counsel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittman v. . KimberlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Sondley v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Pipkin v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Hemphill v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Hahn v. Brinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Herbin v. WagonerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Lindsey v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of HonorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Causey v. . SnowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API