Legal Opinion

Causey v. . Snow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petition of defendant for writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

ClaeK, J.:

This cause having been determined below 'at February Term, 1894, should have been docketed here before the completion of the call of the docket of the district to wliieh it belonged at Fall Term, 1894. Rule 5 of this Court. If for any good reason it was not so docketed the appellant should at that time have applied for a certio-rari (Rule 41), otherwise the appellant might have docketed a certificate and had the appeal dismissed. Rule 17. Though as the appellee did not do this, the appellant could have docketed the appeal at any time during said Fall Term. All this was summarized in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Avery v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Graham v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. State v. . FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Faison & Gillespie v. LorantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Murray v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Standard Mirror Co. v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Mirror Co. v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API