Pipkin v. . Green

Clark, J.:

This is a motion made at September Term, 1892, to re-instate the appeal which had been dismissed at February Term, 1892 (110 N C., 462), for failure to print, and also for failure to docket at the proper Term. The motion to re-instate, when the dismissal is for failure to print, must be made at the same Term (Rule 30 of the Supreme Court), and will only then be allowed “for good cause shown.” The mo.tion, therefore, comes too late, and must be denied.

The motion, indeed, does not show good cause. Stephens v. Koonce, 106 N. C., 255, is in point. Furthermore, notice of the motion to…