Legal Opinion

People v. Hernandez

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1988No. S001689PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARGUELLES, J.

This case requires us to resolve whether a sentencing judge may impose an additional three-year term under Penal Code section 667.8 (kidnapping for purposes of rape) 1 when violation of that section was not pled or proven and was mentioned for the first time in a probation report. We conclude that such additional term may not be imposed, since a pleading and proof requirement should be implied as a matter of statutory interpretation and must be implied as a matter of due process.

Facts

The offense in this case occurred on the night of September 6, 1985, in Big Pine, Inyo…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API