People v. Hernandez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARGUELLES, J.
This case requires us to resolve whether a sentencing judge may impose an additional three-year term under Penal Code section 667.8 (kidnapping for purposes of rape) 1 when violation of that section was not pled or proven and was mentioned for the first time in a probation report. We conclude that such additional term may not be imposed, since a pleading and proof requirement should be implied as a matter of statutory interpretation and must be implied as a matter of due process.
Facts
The offense in this case occurred on the night of September 6, 1985, in Big Pine, Inyo…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.