Legal Opinion

Boaz v. Mutual Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided December 27, 1943No. 2163PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

This is an action on a double indemnity insurance policy issued by defendant to Bert Boaz, insured, with plaintiff as beneficiary. Plaintiff conceded and the cause was tried on the theory that insured’s death was the result of self-destruction. The issue: was insured sane or insane at the time he performed the acts resulting in death. If insane, death'was accidental under the terms of the policy of insurance and plaintiff is entitled to recover under the accidental provision of the policy. If sane, defendant is not liable under its policy.

At the conclusion of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Life Insurance v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Manhattan Life Insurance v. BroughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Insurance Co. v. RodelSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frances Kern v. Txo Production CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Boaz v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1959
  4. State v. ScelfoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. Cook v. LichtblauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API