Rozzen v. Blumenfeld
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict for defendants in an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff when he was riding his bicycle and collided with an automobile operated by the defendant Blumenfeld. The grounds urged for reversal are two: first, that the court committed prejudicial error in giving an instruction which extended to defendants the benefit of a presumption that they exercised ordinary care; and second, that prejudicial error resulted from the giving of a number of instructions upon the assumption that there was evidence of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Speck v. SarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Paulsen v. McDuffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Mundy v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Cole v. RidingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Stout v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Zollars v. BarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Wilsey-Bennett Trucking Company, a Corporation v. A. W. Frost and M. K. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Nunnemaker v. HeadleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.