Legal Opinion

Mundy v. Marshall

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1937No. L. A. 16033PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff in an action for damages for the wrongful death of her husband and is taken from a judgment entered in pursuance of a directed verdict for the defendants and from an order denying her motion for a new trial. The case was taken over on petition for hearing after decision by the District Court of Appeal for the purpose of giving further consideration to the question of whether the testimony of the plaintiff’s witness Nix overcomes the presumption, established by subdivision 4 of section 1963 of the Code of Civil Procedure, that “a person takes ordinary care of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. McDuffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Atkins v. BouchetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Horton v. StollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Speck v. SarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API