Illinois Glass Co. v. Ozell Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Sheridan E. Fry, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom
This review is sought by defendant from a judgment against it in favor of plaintiff for $918.02.
The parties, as shown by the record, had two transactions, in both of which plaintiff was the seller and defendant the purchaser. The commodities sold were bottles. The amount due for the first sale was paid, that for the second is unpaid, and to enforce its payment this suit was commenced. In this suit defendant has counterclaimed for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of defects in the bottles sold and paid for, a large quantity of which defendant endeavored to return to plaintiff.
Th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Higbie v. RustIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Smith v. BillingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Horn v. NobleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Turnbull Joice Lumber Co. v. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
- Waukesha Canning Co. v. Henry Horner & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Santa Rosa-Vallejo Tanning Co. v. Charles Kronauer & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923
- Phil Jacobs Co. v. MifflinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Hall v. BergschneiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932