Legal Opinion

Turnbull Joice Lumber Co. v. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 18, 1910No. Gen. No. 14,807PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Cottrell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The Turnhull Joice Lumber Company sued the Chicago Lumber & Coal Company in the Municipal Court for a balance on a disputed account for lumber sold and delivered. On the trial of the cause the parties made the following stipulation as to the facts:

“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto that in order to avoid the necessity on the part of each of the parties to this cause of making detailed proof of all of the various items as the same are set forth in the bill of particulars of the plaintiff, and in the defendant’s set off, the facts relating to the accounts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Higbie v. RustIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Clause v. Bullock Printing Press Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Kelley, Maus & Co. v. CaffreyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  4. Smith v. BillingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Horn v. NobleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harry B. Smead Co. ex rel. Scandinavian Seed Co. v. J. Oliver Johnson, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  2. Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  3. Illinois Glass Co. v. Ozell Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  4. Marrone v. EhratAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Duncan Lumber Co. v. Leonard Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API