Horn v. Noble
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, for .goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Alexander W. Hope, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1900.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Creighton
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action of assumpsit by appellee against appellant, in the City Court of East St. Louis, to recover for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by appellee to appellant. Trial was by jury. At the close of all the evidence, the jury, under direction from the court to that effect, returned a verdict in favor of appellee for $310.28, the amount of his demand.
Appellee’s declaration consisted of the common counts only. x To this declaration appellant filed the general issue and a plea of set-off. The plea of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- De Forrest v. OderIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Smith v. BillingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Hartshorn v. KinsmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turnbull Joice Lumber Co. v. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
- Illinois Glass Co. v. Ozell Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1916
- Marrone v. EhratAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Cary v. NibloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
- Raymond v. VarnumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.