People v. Rasure
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(c)
I. ISSUE
Disbarment is generally appropriate when a lawyer knowingly converts client property and causes injury or potential injury to a client. Respondent engaged in a pattern of misconduct, which included the knowing conversion of client property. Respondent failed to answer the complaints or otherwise participate in these proceedings in a meaningful manner. What is the appropriate sanction for his misconduct?
SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY DISBARRED
II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The People filed complaints in this consolidated matter on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- People v. MotsenbockerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.