Legal Opinion

People v. Motsenbocker

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 12, 1996No. 96SA385PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline ease misappropriated funds from a bar association account of which he was the treasurer. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent and the complainant, C.R.C.P. 241.18, which recommended that the respondent be disbarred. We accept the conditional admission and the recommendation.

I

For purposes of these proceedings, we accept the facts as set forth in the conditional admission. The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1992.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. LavenharSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. MundisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. KatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. People v. DiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API