Legal Opinion

State v. Philip Morris Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 2008No. 2844, Sept. Term, 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This case involves a dispute between appellant, the State of Maryland, and appellees, Philip Morris USA, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Lorillard Tobacco Co. (collectively, the original participating manufacturers) and more than forty small tobacco manufacturers (collectively, the subsequent participating manufacturers). In 1998, the original participating manufacturers and the State, along with fifty-one other states and territories (collectively, the settling states), signed the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). The MSA resolved the settling states’ claims of wrongful marketing and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34 v. Maryland Transportation AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Greitens v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. State Ex Rel. Riley v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. McGraw v. American Tobacco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Masto v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. CT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API