Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 24, 1989No. 23700-4-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Bradley Marshall filed a motion seeking discretionary review of a superior court's RALJ order holding that Marshall's affidavit of prejudice in municipal court was timely and should not have been rejected, but limiting the remedy available to him. The motion was referred to a panel for determination.

Marshall was charged with domestic assault against his wife in Seattle Municipal Court. On August 4, 1987, he waived a jury trial, and a bench trial before Judge Norma Huggins was scheduled for September 3. Marshall was aware of the judge assigned to his case. On the day of trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heaney v. Seattle Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. In Re the Welfare of McGeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. State v. ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. EspinozaWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hessler Construction Co. v. LooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Abad v. CozzaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In Re the Marriage of LemonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of LemonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API