Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Marriage of Lemon
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 5, 1990No. 12189-1-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.
The only subject worthy of discussion in this case is the frontal assault by appellant Wilbur Lemon's attorney on former Pierce County Superior Court Local Rule 12, regulating the timing of affidavits of prejudice.1 We uphold the rule.
*570The Pierce County Superior Court employs a departmental docket system for civil cases. A civil case is assigned to a specific judge as soon as a note of issue is filed, either for the motion docket or for the trial assignment docket. The assignment lists are widely publicized well before the applicable court date. No Pierce County lawyer appearing for a motion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Sealy, Incorporated, a Corporation v. Easy Living, Inc., a Corporation, and Danco, Inc., and Jack Ward Mattress, Inc., D/B/A Pacifica Mattress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- State ex rel. Lefebvre v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re the Marriage of LemonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hanno v. Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Lori Shavlik v. Dawson PlaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Bachtold v. BoeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.