Legal Opinion

Wherry v. Luckey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1924No. 13531PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This suit was instituted by plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against the defendant in error, defendant below, in the district court of Okmulgee 'county, Okla., on September 2, 1921, to'recover $346 with interest and attorney’s fee, alleged to be the balance' due on a certain bill of plumbing, furnished by plaintiffs and placed in a residence belonging to defendant.

From the facts as disclosed by the record it. appears that’Floyd Luckey was the son of Louis Luckey, defendant herein, and that. Louis Luckey was the owner of a tract of land near the city of Okmulgee, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ShirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Lyons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NewburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Fant v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Builders Bureau v. Chickasaw Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Woods v. LevineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Crookum v. KetchumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Hummer v. Henryetta State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Prichard v. DurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API