Legal Opinion
Mangum Electric Co. v. Border
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 24, 1923No. 10814PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This action was commenced by Dr. G. F. Border against the MangUm Electric Company, John O. Keys, and certain other defendants to recover damages for injury to his business, reputation, and health, and for exemplary damages. The allegations of the petition are substantially as followis: That Dr. Border, a regularly licensed and practicing physician, conducted a hospital at Mangum, Okla., and was mayor of said city. That on or about the 1st day of July, 1914, Doctor ■ Border, as mayor, and the city council of Mangum called a special election to be, held on the 4th day of August, 1914, in said…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. HornIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Merrick v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Bandag of Springfield, Inc. v. Bandag, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hughes v. BizzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Nash v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.