Hawes v. Lux
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff brought an action for money had and received seeking to recover the sum of $7,000 paid to defendants as a deposit on the purchase price of certain real property. Trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.
The property involved consisted of a dwelling-house in Beverly Hills owned by defendants. The purchase price was $68,100. Plaintiff paid to defendants a deposit of $7,000 and agreed to take the property subject to a mortgage of $17,000 and to pay the balance of $44,100 within ninety days after May 14, 1926.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Berryman v. Hotel Savoy CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Joyce v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Foundation Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.