Legal Opinion

Hawes v. Lux

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1931No. Docket No. 7709PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for money had and received seeking to recover the sum of $7,000 paid to defendants as a deposit on the purchase price of certain real property. Trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

The property involved consisted of a dwelling-house in Beverly Hills owned by defendants. The purchase price was $68,100. Plaintiff paid to defendants a deposit of $7,000 and agreed to take the property subject to a mortgage of $17,000 and to pay the balance of $44,100 within ninety days after May 14, 1926.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Berryman v. Hotel Savoy CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Joyce v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Foundation Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API