Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Holland & Hart

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1993No. 91CA1270PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PLANK.

In this legal malpractice action against defendant, Holland and Hart, plaintiffs, John H. Roberts, Jr., and RISCOR, Inc., appeal from a partial summary judgment dismissing their claim for lost profits. Plaintiffs also appeal the trial court’s ruling that they are entitled to damages only in the amount of the attorneys’ fees paid for work negligently completed by Holland & Hart, rather than for all attorneys’ fees paid to that firm. Finally, plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s dismissal of certain claims assigned to RISCOR by application of the principle that legal…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Brown v. City And County OfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. MNC Credit Corp. v. SickelsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. New Hampshire Insurance v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Gibbons v. LudlowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API