City of Cleveland ex rel. Neelon v. Locher
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.
The basic question raised by this case is as follows:
Where a plain and unmistakably clear provision in a city charter is not self-executing, but is followed by a provision that council shall, by ordinance, provide for the enforcement of such provision, does mandamus lie to compel the council to enact such an ordinance?
It should be pointed out that city firemen are city employees and have a direct interest in this matter. It must be further noted that the appointment of such municipal employees is a matter of local self-government. State, ex rel. Canada, v. Phillips (1958), 168 Ohio St. 191,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Masters v. BeamerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Strain v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fuldauer v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Borsuk v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Cater v. N. OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Pell v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.