Legal Opinion

Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Cytek Biosciences Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 15, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00933Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BECTON, DICKINSON AND Case No. 18-cv-00933-MMC COMPANY, 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 DISMISS; AFFORDING LEAVE TO v. AMEND 10 CYTEK BIOSCIENCES INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is defendant/counterclaimant Cytek Biosciences Inc.’s (“Cytek”) 14 motion, filed January 9, 2020, to dismiss the Fifth and Eighth Claims for Relief asserted 15 against it in plaintiff/counterdefendant Becton, Dickinson and Company’s (“BD”) Second 16 Amended Complaint. BD has filed opposition, to which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API