The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. The Hercules Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, holding that the “Power Trac” retread design of the Hercules Tire & Rubber Company does not infringe Goodyear’s United States Design Patent No. 349,080 (the ’080 patent). 1 Hercules cross appeals the district court’s determination that the ’080 patent is not unenforceable for inequitable conduct. We affirm the decisions of the district court.
BACKGROUND
Goodyear’s ’080 patent, inventor Robert P. Loser, is for a design of a tire tread, as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Fiskars, Inc. And Fiskars Oy Ab v. Hunt Manufacturing Co., and Joseph F. Posillico, Sanctioned Party-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Bernhardt, L.L.C. v. Collezione Europa Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power System, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.