Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on April 28,1983, in which the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, after a bench trial, held valid a United States utility patent and a United States design patent, both owned by Litton Systems. The district court also found that certain microwave ovens manufactured and sold by Whirlpool Corporation infringe these two patents, bear a false designation of origin as prohibited by Section 43(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1125-(a) (1982), and by the Minnesota Uniform Deceptive Trade…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by202 opinions
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Scandia Down Corporation, a California Corporation, and Goose Down, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Euroquilt, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.