Legal Opinion
International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 17, 2009No. 2009-1237PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant International Seaway Trading Corporation (“Seaway”) filed suit against Walgreens Corporation (“Wal-greens”) and Touchsport Footwear USA, Inc. (“Touchsport”) claiming infringement of Seaway’s patents, U.S. Design Patents Nos. D529,263 (“the '263 patent”), D545,-032 (“the '032 patent”), and D545,033 (“the '033 patent”). The district court granted summary judgment for defendants, finding that the claims of the asserted patents were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by a patent assigned to Crocs, Inc. (“Crocs”), U.S. Design Patent No. D517,789…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Richardson v. Stanley Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Park B. Smith, Inc. v. Chf Industries Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- High Point Design LLC v. Buyer's Direct, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Curver Luxembourg, Sarl v. Home Expressions Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.