Legal Opinion
People v. Gold
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
The defendant Gold who has been indicted on a charge of abortion (Indictment No. 1266-64) has applied for an order “ to suppress the evidence seized from the defendant or from his office at 1745 Catón Avenue in the County of Kings on May 12, 1964, to suppress any evidence the People may have received via a wiretap or through any electronic eavesdropping, and to suppress any confession or statement given to them by Doctor Gold * * * on and after May 12,1964
*496Defendants Scharfstein and Raicus are separately charged with the crime of abortion (3 counts) in that on various dates they, acting in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. ScharfsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. McCallNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. PietramalaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975