Legal Opinion

People v. Pietramala

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided October 21, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMax H. Galfunt, J.

The defendant was charged with promoting gambling (Penal Law, § 225.05) and possession of gambling records (Penal Law, § 225.15).

The defendant now moves to controvert a search warrant and suppress evidence seized thereby. The affidavit contained information based on personal observations by. the officer. From the observations by the officer, the issuing Magistrate concluded probable cause existed and issued the warrant.

The defendant contends that the affidavit supporting the search warrant lacked probable cause; that the expertise of the officer is required to be set forth in the affidavit;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. HanlonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. HendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CammeNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. CiccarelliCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1980
  3. People v. Turner, New York County Courts1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API