Legal Opinion
Investors Premium Corp. v. Burroughs Corp.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 1, 1974No. Civ. A. 72-1526PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
ORDER
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION UNDER RULE 37(d) TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY ANSWER WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES, AND ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION UNDER RULE 56 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
Defendant has moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(d) 1 for dismissal of the second amended complaint with prejudice and costs, because of plaintiff’s failure to properly answer written interrogatories, denoting purported answers as sham, and, in the alternative, defendant moves under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment in favor of defendant.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- MacAndrews & Forbes Co. v. American Barmag Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1972
- Parham-Thomas-McSwain, Inc. v. Atlantic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Moody v. StemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Dailey Co. v. American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
- Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Closed Circuit Corp. of America v. Jerrold Electronics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Harold Heath Hill v. Basf Wyandotte CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.