Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 22, 1995No. 94-615PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

Defendant, Douglas & Lomason Company (DLC), discharged plaintiff, Terry Anderson, for taking a box of pencils. Anderson responded with a breach-of-contract action claiming DLC failed to follow progressive discipline policies contained in the employee handbook. The district court granted DLC’s motion for summary judgment, which argued, in part, that the handbook did not constitute a contract. Anderson appealed.

Although we conclude progressive discipline policies meeting the requirements for a unilateral contract are enforceable, a disclaimer in the handbook given to Anderson…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. National City Bank of NY v. HotchkissSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Hotchkiss v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Tralon Corp. v. Cedarapids, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  2. Magnusson Agency v. Public Entity National Co.-MidwestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Phipps v. IASD Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Lockhart v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API