Legal Opinion
King v. National General Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 15, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-00313-DMRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY
Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs1 are qualified “Good Drivers”2 who purchased car insurance from the Defendant insurance companies. Plaintiffs now bring a putative class action alleging that Defendants failed to offer Plaintiffs and the putative class members their lowest Good Driver rates, as required by California law. Before the court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss (“MTD”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), and motion to strike (“MTS”) pursuant to Federal Rule…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- King v. National General Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Benanav v. Healthy Paws Pet Insurance LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Day v. GEICO Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Hilario v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Parducci v. AMCO Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.