Legal Opinion
Greene v. Sprint Communications Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2003No. 02-56339PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Is there a private right of action to recover damages for violating regulations promulgated by the Federal Communica*1049tions Commission (FCC) pursuant to § 276 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that require interexchange carriers to compensate payphone service providers for “dial-around” telephone calls made from their payphones? The district court held that there was not, and we agree. We therefore affirm dismissal of an action by Zane Greene and other payphone service providers against Sprint Communications Company, a long-distance telecommunications carrier,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Donna Marie Walls, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co., LPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Pemberton v. Nationstar Mortg. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.