Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Erie & Kalamazoo Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Quo warranto.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This is an application by the Attorney General for leave to file an information in the nature of a quo warranto against the Erie & Kalamazoo Railroad Company. Notice was given to the respondent, and it has been heard in opposition to the application. The Erie & Kalamazoo Railroad Company was chartered by an act of the territorial legislature of Michigan, approved April 22, 1833 (3 Terr. L. 1125). The charter was perpetual, but was amended in 1816 so as to authorize the Legislature at any time to alter, amend or repeal it.

As originally granted, the charter authorized the company to construct a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Vrooman v. MichieMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Janesville Water Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. FrostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API