Legal Opinion

Muller v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 1924No. 12584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This appeal is prosecuted by the plaintiff in error, one of the defendants below, from a judg-' ment of the district court of Custer county in favor of T. F. Campbell, the plaintiff in. the trial court, and for convenience the plaintiff in error, H. J. Muller, will be designated as defendant and T. F. Campbell will be designated as plaintiff in this opinion.

On January 3, 1920, the plaintiff brought suit on a verbal agreement against H. J.Muller and Frank T. Jennings to recover $3,631 for work and labor performed and materials furnished in constructing a derrick for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Lee v. TonsorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Basham v. Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Ross v. BreeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Gentry-Bowers Lumber Co. v. HamillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Hubbard v. StottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API