Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Stotts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1935No. 24042PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants in error C. A. Stotts and Hattie Stotts, hereinafter designated as plaintiffs, brought this action against the plaintiff in error, C. H. Hubbard, hereinafter designated as Hub’ bard, and against other parties, for the cancellation of an oil and gas lease covering certain lots in Tappan Heights addition to Oklahoma City.

The evidence discloses that the lease in question was executed by the plaintiffs, as lessors, to the Shield Petroleum Company under date of April 9, 1930, and covered a primary term of two years from date, and as long thereafter as oil or gas should be produced…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. VanderbiltIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hopkins v. HudsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Meek v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  4. Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. SayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Cooke v. Southwest Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Butt v. Vermejo Park Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Mitchell Drilling Co. v. Robert L. Kinkaid, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API